[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: no display manager for 3 days



> On Thu 24 Jul 2014 at 10:37:34 +0000, Alan Simpson-Vlach wrote:
> 
> > Ever since a dist-upgrade that installed systemd and removed
> > sysvinit-core, I have been unable to get a display manager.
> 
> The dist-upgrade would have more than this. You are using testing?
> 
> > I have tried slim, lightdm, and even installed gdm3.  Nothing works.
> > 
> > # /etc/init.d/slim/start
> > 
> > gives no error messages, but
> > 
> > # systemctl status slim.service
> > 
> > tells me that slim exited with status=1
> > 
> > The pertinent line appears to be
> > 
> > /usr/bin/X11/X: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so: undefined symbol: LoadExtension
> > 
> > which is similar to what happens if I try xinit directly.
> > 
> > Trying lightdm I get 
> > 
> > lightdm.service start request repeated too quickly, refusing to start.
> > 
> > I think this is a systemd problem, but maybe it's a video driver problem?
> > I'm using the proprietary nvidia driver, which has been recompiled multiple times now.
> > Help, please.  I'd kinda like to have a working X11 again.
> 
> If xinit or startx will not bring up X it seems more like a video
> problem to me. How do feel about using the nouveau driver if you cannot
> fix the proprietary one?

I had problems with nouveau about a year ago, so I switched back to the proprietary driver.
The NVIDIA driver has always been reliable, even if non-open-source and a pain in the neck to have to recompile with every new kernel.
But at this point, I'd be happy with _anything_ that gives me X back. Here goes:

sudo install xserver-xorg-video-nouveau

(My memory tells me this used to ask if I wanted my proprietary nvidia setup disabled. That didn't happen this time.)

No change whatsoever.  Invoking startx/xinit still doesn't work.
I still get the complaint about libglx.so

One respondent said maybe my GLX installation is broken.  How do I fix that? 

Thanks much,
--Alan


Reply to: