Re: I'm not a huge fan of systemd
Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 13:19:21 schrieb The Wanderer:
> On 07/18/2014 12:56 PM, Slavko wrote:
> > Ahoj,
> >
> > Dňa Fri, 18 Jul 2014 18:10:58 +0200 Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org>
> >
> > napísal:
> >> That's quite afalse this... count every package which depends
> >> direectly or indirectly on systemd, often without real need...
> >
> > If you can decide this (i an not able this), please fill bugreport
> > about unneeded dependency against this (these) package(s).
>
> I think (not having done the research to verify this) that the idea is
> that some - many? - packages need PAM, and depend (perhaps indirectly)
> on an appropriate package for that, but that package now depends
> (perhaps indirectly) on libpam-systemd, which depends on 'systemd-sysv |
> systemd-shim', which results in systemd-sysv getting installed without
> notice, even though the original package didn't need systemd in the
> first place.
Look here:
Debian Bug report logs - #754984
libpam-systemd: re-add alternative dependency on systemd-shim
https://bugs.debian.org/754984
Was linked from the other bug report I mentioned.
Ciao,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Reply to: