Re: I'm not a huge fan of systemd
On Tue 08 Jul 2014 at 23:22:36 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Brian <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Sun 06 Jul 2014 at 19:01:38 +0100, Brian wrote:
> >> You had the time on similar dubious grounds to doubt the veracity of the
> >> information you were given.
> > It is possible the last mail did not fully or clearly address your major
> > concern.
> > With systemd-journald running or not running ('systemctl mask
> > systemd-journald') 'ps ax' shows /usr/sbin/rsyslogd listening. Messages
> > are logged to the usual places in /var/log. You can be confident that
> > the information you already had about binary logs with journald was not
> > false. ^
> Sorry, but you've over-trimmed at this point. I've been trying to |
> participate in the thread and I can't tell what concerns you must |
> think you have answered. Partly because, if you've added anything new |
> to the conversation, I can't see it. |
[🔎] 53B97149.firstname.lastname@example.org">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 53B97149.email@example.com |
this concern was voiced: |
> So it means that when I read on this list that we would not have to |
> suffer binary logs with journald, it was false... ^
>From a couple of tests I concluded no suffering was in the offing. |
This paragraph is what I wrote: -------> ----------------> --------------
I then followed up with
[🔎] 20140707181026.GI27249@copernicus.demon.co.uk">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20140707181026.GI27249@copernicus.demon.co.uk
where it says
> So your text-based logs won't be gone with the switch to systemd.
> Let me repeat that: Jessie will have text-based logs, nothing in that
> regard changes.
There is a number of things users are rightly concerned about when
upgrading to jessie; having only binary logs isn't one of them.