On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:05:09PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > First of all, you've broken the thread. The thread was broken once > already by the March / April forced break at the end of the month. > You can't help that. But this time, you've broken it yourself by > starting a new thread. Thread wasn't broken here. The References: header in Robert's mail indicates that it was indeed a reply (to his original post on this thread). I see that you have an In-Reply-To: header, but no References: header. I also see that you are using Zimbra, perhaps Zimbra needs to be taught about References: headers. Cheers, Tom -- The Second Law of Thermodynamics: If you think things are in a mess now, just wait! -- Jim Warner
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature