Re: Brainless Debian Stable installation and usage?
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:47:27AM +0000, Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 01:28:11 -0500
> "Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com" <littdom@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > What followed XP was Vista, and who would do that to themselves. In my
> > opinion (not that I'm an expert on Windows), Windows 7 wasn't much
> > better. And Windows 8 is a confusing mess. I wouldn't upgrade from XP
> > either, unless it was to Linux or BSD.
>
> In the interests of balance, most people get their ideas about new
> Windows versions from 'journalists'. Vista has its problems, the main
> one being its insistence on running with zero free memory, filling the
> machine with anything it thinks you might want to use, and therefore
> being slow to open new documents. Windows 7 is enormously better and
> quicker, Vista was effectively a beta Windows 7, released before it was
> ready.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Linux also use all available
memory?
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: