Re: nano vs VI

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: nano vs VI
From: Paul Cartwright <pbcartwright@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:43:23 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 52C4B62B.3010109@gmail.com>
Reply-to: pbcartwright@gmail.com
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 52C4AC09.8000703@walnut.gen.nz>
References: <[🔎] 52C41F3C.9050004@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20140101150936.0b13e601@debian-workstation.lan> <[🔎] 52C4322B.6010905@list-post.mks-mail.de> <[🔎] 52C4AC09.8000703@walnut.gen.nz>

On 01/01/2014 07:00 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
> Also perhaps:
>
> aptitude purge nano :-)
>
> Richard
thanks, I might do that also, since I use either VI or gedit..

-- 
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nano vs VI
  - From: shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com>

References:
- nano vs VI
  - From: Paul Cartwright <pbcartwright@gmail.com>
- Re: nano vs VI
  - From: Andreas Rönnquist <mailinglists@gusnan.se>
- Re: nano vs VI
  - From: Markus Schönhaber <debian-user@list-post.mks-mail.de>
- Re: nano vs VI
  - From: Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian Wheezy Compromised - www-data user is sending 1000 emails an hour
Next by Date: Re: [OT] non technical Q: bad or worse. Was: To do the same as Windows safe mode...........
Previous by thread: Re: nano vs VI
Next by thread: Re: nano vs VI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread