Re: should an end user stick to a kernel with an initrd?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should an end user stick to a kernel with an initrd?
From: Michael Biebl <email@michaelbiebl.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:35:12 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 5255BE00.8090405@michaelbiebl.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20131009175158.GA23410@nt1.in>
References: <CAOdo=SwjTH237aXqZ=oAa3tVEg_0znH7OHTCGn_6is6+9GhZZA@mail.gmail.com> <20130927192801.GA3428@nt1.in> <[🔎] 20131008220850.GS4910@codelibre.net> <[🔎] 20131009175158.GA23410@nt1.in>

Am 09.10.2013 19:51, schrieb Regid Ichira:
>   For me, the enumeration of devices is guaranteeted.  As already

For you it is (maybe), under a lot of circumstances it isn't.
Is that so hard to understand.

Michael

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: should an end user stick to a kernel with an initrd?
  - From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net>
- Re: should an end user stick to a kernel with an initrd?
  - From: Regid Ichira <regid23@nt1.in>

Prev by Date: Re: which MTA to choose for a simple client?
Next by Date: Re: which MTA to choose for a simple client?
Previous by thread: Re: should an end user stick to a kernel with an initrd?
Next by thread: Re: should an end user stick to a kernel with an initrd?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread