Re: Problem with kernel-image-3.10-2-amd64
Everyone,
Thank you for your help and suggestions. I was able to add
rootdelay=5 to the kernel line and this resolved the issue for me.
Sincerely.
Shane
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Chris Bannister
<cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:16:38PM +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>> I had impression that 'rootdelay=5' had solved your problem and that
>> is why I gave you that link.
>
> If you read the thread, you will see it was not me. Also note, it was
> another poster (Hugo) who suggested that the OP try 'rootdelay=5' to see
> if it helped.
>
>> To your question - if 'rootdelay=5' solves your problem then it's a
>> known problem.
>
> Incorrect. A known problem is one that is explicitly documented for that
> specific version of software.
>
> I can see that language barriers may confuse the meaning of words.
>
> Think of the well known ports 1-1024 as an example of the use of
> the word "known". It is the same usage in regards to a known bug.
>
> --
> "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
> who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
> oppressing." --- Malcolm X
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130930145059.GA25109@tal
>
--
Shane D. Johnson
IT Administrator
Rasmussen Equipment
Reply to: