Re: Best recommendations for posting anonymously?? Looking for pointers
>>>>> "berenger" == berenger morel <berenger.morel@neutralite.org> writes:
berenger> Le 11.01.2013 23:27, Engineering Safety Organization a
berenger> écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone have any great suggestions for how to best post
>> anonymously to web sites and how to create web sites and web
>> servers to allow participants a reasonable expectation of
>> anonymity so that they can freely post their concerns?
>>
>> There is a pro-regulation website, http://www.engsafety.org, on
>> which I would like to add directions describing how best to
>> post anonymously for end users. I would like US govt
>> regulators to be able to comment about the problems and
>> corruption they encounter at their jobs without fear of
>> retaliation, but I am not sure how best to set-up a site which
>> could provide this service. The hope would be to coordinate a
>> bright light on the current regulatory problems to help speed
>> up the process of regulatory reform through safe public
>> discourse.
>>
>> Have any other site already successfully achieved this result?
>>
>> Help and feedback are appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Engsafety
berenger> I think Tor
berenger> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network))
berenger> and freenet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet) are
berenger> some interesting starting points.
Berenger, thanks for the feedback and all suggestions are appreciated.
I looked at the Tor project already and oddly the web site topic came
up in my local gym. The consensus on the Tor project is that it seems
to be a US govt sponsored project to lure and track potential
terrorists on the web. The project looks really suspicious, and there
was wide doubt in just our gym about its intentions. I would not feel
comfortable recommending it for http://www.engsafety.org, which is
critical of the failure of US regulators.
I think there must be a better approach to anonymity. I am sure our
site is not the first to need this type of setup.
Thanks again for the input.
Engsafety.
Reply to: