On Sb, 12 ian 13, 13:23:35, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2013-01-12 12:07 +0100, Johan Grönqvist wrote: > > > With priority up to 100, the packages from experimental will not be > > upgraded with a normal upgrade command, but the packages will need > > explicit upgrade requests. > > > > As packages from experimental are experimental and may break your > > system without warning, requiring you to explicitly request upgrades > > of such packages seems like a good idea to me. > > Of course experimental should always be at a lower pinning priority than > unstable, but I still like the idea of upgrading those packages which > have been installed from experimental automatically. Otherwise it's too > easy to end up with outdated and totally unsupported packages. That's exactly why I suggested 100. Since this is the same priority as installed packages apt/itude will upgrade the package if newer versions are available, but will not install new packages, unless specifically requested to. Anything higher than 100 and one might pull packages from experimental without intending to. BTW, this is the same priority used by backports now. Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature