Le 01.12.2012 21:59, Chris Bannister a écrit :
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 02:34:12PM +0100, berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:Le 01.12.2012 07:50, Chris Bannister a écrit : >On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:35:41PM +0100, "Morel Bérenger" wrote: >>If I am not wrong, .NET have documented specifications, and I >>~think~ they >>are also doing some free softwares. > >$ apt-cache show mono-complete > I was speaking about microsoft :)Ummm, ... OK. Did I snip the wrong bit?
No, just you took it out of context ;)
My response was because you said "... and I ~think~ they are also doingI think you mixed .NET softwares and .NET framework. First ones are softwares using the second one, and mono is the free version of the second one, if I am not wrong. I was simply speaking about microsoft making free stuff, no matter if it is windows only and/or using .NET.some free softwares." I was meaning that there is no need to worry whether they are doing free .NET software or not because according to apt-cache show mono-complete"
I hope my words are more clear now