Re: "Abberant symptopm" or "bug worth attempting to duplicate"?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: "Abberant symptopm" or "bug worth attempting to duplicate"?
- From: Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 20:45:28 +1300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20121201074528.GC17068@tal>
- In-reply-to: <50B752D8.2040200@cloud85.net>
- References: <50B6AD67.2050505@cloud85.net> <20121129092512.GW9165@sid.nuvreauspam> <20121129110351.GD7215@hawking> <50B752D8.2040200@cloud85.net>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:19:36AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:25:12AM +0000, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >>
> >>The error messages would have been very useful.
>
> Of course - for an proper bug report.
> After giving the highs and lows of my initial tries, that is why I
> asked "Do I have enough to justify ME spending time to get
> reproducible results?" That has an implied question "Would my
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> results be expected due not having a primary partition or not having
> a swap partition?"
You might be interested in reading this:
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=542341
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: