Re: Storage server
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:07:47PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 06:49:45PM +0200, Veljko wrote:
> > a) backup (backup server for several dedicated (mainly) web servers).
> > It will contain incremental backups, so only first running will take a
> > lot of time, rsnapshot
>
> Best avoid rsnapshot. Use (at least) rdiff-backup instead, which is nearly
> a drop-in replacement (but scales); or consider something like bup or obnam
> instead.
Any particular reason for avoiding rsnapshot? What are advantages of
using rdiff-backup or obnam?
Regards,
Veljko
Reply to: