[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: systemd



On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:05:15 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> <malicious mode on>
>>>
>>> I hope sysvinit is still available (and be the default option) for at
>>> least a couple of years until systemd is being bright polished by the
>>> rest of the other friendly linux distributions >>:-)
>>>
>>> </malicious mode off>
>>
>> Rather cheeky! :)
>>
>> I've been using systemd on Fedora (F15, F16, F17) and it works very
>> well. I had an F15 dev box on which I had to mess around with rc.local
>> to get two nfs mounts to work. I now have six F16 and six F17 boxes in
>> production that are running just fine. There may have been many problems
>> with systemd on F15 but I'd *guess* (and could be *completely* wrong but
>> my search powers on Debian's BTS and RH's Bugzilla suck...) that on F17
>> there are hardly more problems with systemd as there are problems with
>> sysvinit on squeeze.
>
> Are those boxes (where systemd is doing a good job) used as pure servers?
>
> I ask because most of the complaints I've read about systemd do come from
> server machines more that the usual desktop/mobile systems.

Yes servers. ~95% of the clients at that company are Macs.


Reply to: