On Jo, 26 iul 12, 06:30:23, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > However, many people claim that pulseaudio is an advantage only. And now > everybody claims that systemd is an advantage only. I didn't get this impression from reading -devel. > I experienced pulseaudio as a PITA for myself (pro-audio), but also as a > showstopper when "averaged" people (= people who don't need pro-audio) > try to switch from Windows to Linux. > > Is systemd ready yet? > > To get off the track: Not only Poettering's stuff is "experimental", > also the switch from nv to nouveau IMO is insane. AFAIU nv was unmaintainable because of code obfuscation. nouveau is still quite young, of course it has problems. The only way to fix such problems is for users to report them and follow-up with information as needed, since developers can't have the whole range of hardware to test compatibility with all chipsets. > I decided to use Linux, because Linux in the past based on stable > software. I wonder about the benefits to switch to unfinished stuff > nowadays. > > Believing what I read at Arch-general mailing list, configuring systemd > will be in some kind of irrational secret language. The example you posted in the other message is definitely better than shell (which is the language of current initscripts). Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature