[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian 5 - was Re: Query abouut root account



On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Lisi wrote:


On Sunday 22 July 2012 19:08:46 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
But I was unable to install the drivers for the printer, on the
Debian 6 workstation.

Try splix.

+1

Lisi




My previous experience with splix, is not good.

From memory, I tried splix with the first CLX-3185FW (it died a few
months ago, just before the Debian 5 workstation died, from memory - we have an unsafe electricity supply in this state), as Debian 5 did not have the drivers, but splix did not work, and I had a problem with the splix contact, so I used the manufacturer's software, downloaded from the manufacturer's web site. But, that worked with Debian 5, and, not with Debian 6. My wife's Samsung CLX-3175 seems to work okay with Debian 6, and she had used her CLX-3175 with Ubuntu (she gave up on Ubuntu, due to "power saving" problems that disabled her laptop computer so it would not restart, every time that she left it), and when I got her to switch to Debian 6, instead of her having to use the Samsung manufacturer's software, Debian 6 automatically installed its own printer and scanner software, which sem to be working okay.

As the Debian 5 and 6 included printer drivers, do not include the driver(s) for the Samaung CLX-3185FW, I have had to use the Samsung manufacturer's software, but the Samsung manufacturer's software is incompatible with Debian 6, leading to a possible new classification for printer compatibility with Linux; "doorstop". At about 18" cubed, and, with its weight, it is a bit big for use as a "paperweight".

--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..............

"So once you do know what the question actually is,
 you'll know what the answer means."
- Deep Thought,
  Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
  "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
  A Trilogy In Four Parts",
  written by Douglas Adams,
  published by Pan Books, 1992
....................................................


Reply to: