Re: pidgin ym protocol over ssl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 23.07.2012 07:01, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
> hi,
>
> is it possible to configure pidgin to connect to ym via ssl this is
> because there's an issue at my office where a colleague's message
> had been logged by a network staff
I'm not sure what protocol is ym, but in case you cannot connect to it
with SSL, you could enable encryption in Pidgin.
# aptitude install pidgin-otr pidgin-openpgp
and then enable them in Pidgin plugins menu and you should be able to
encrypt using PGP (or GPG) and OTR.
I think that OTR is more popular than PGP with IM encryption.
- --
Mika Suomalainen
NOTICE! I am on mobile broadband with very limited time, so I cannot
read emails very much.
The best time to contact me is probably weekends when I have better
connectivity with good luck.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key: http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/key.txt
Comment: Fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
Comment: Why do I (clear)sign emails? http://git.io/6FLzWg
Comment: Please remove PGP lines in replies. http://git.io/nvHrDg
Comment: Charset of this message should be UTF-8.
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQDWiTAAoJEE21PP6CpGcoHZMP+wb7qwdrm8C4N9m1DtxOb27j
asxW7kZ04kP+8Ly8vzhKdQxxbR5COkEmhMm9HKW8okDQGx1HP3HNdPg8wliI/gJv
qaTD/IR+0lu4aVrH8JbFPopnqGNMBJdErztbEGCo5YTVdsCZAyJtA0ao4EDS0Zuq
kjR9BXzTlau8FCsE1ewKOgrS6VMnGIoAS7Bo3f1PoC33Fx4W0thOYBOpCgdWydWo
Y5JMY6NmcKuoZ3f/VI6SRjCNo0iTQxzW5oq8nyA1vvkbsZcW5b0h12ABgcip9599
4HxZaKq0YgcABLf58TMtMl3LU0NZk1wJSsNwPnO6X4c8cQa/bBcPHuH6jk7g5tPQ
XRGw9/STA/zvH7pmmykiAFFH8nc2IruC9gdVnZNxDIHfI+ERiX1aasj0OpV4z9Gf
Gm0j4hlACALicPJac7DrxVE2WWXp7A9cGGpCOXqLyYk+5jIi31rjoHgb/Pajbr4L
77m4UssFwyagH2uao97QD5ZjglI6NbWLwmz4a0MA2zc6RVr/AwxrFRUTMYaiK3M7
Rm7XtXCBrd7Jf9iR58mP2AHF4D0GZ0Rak60sOYTe++GB6loEzqbi1xJQtqbLwv/i
zGyuhxqCf6QnZCaJojcGW6cRZmw4L0YRFxrzITFY06Mv8q6d1Er2ZF2zHh2Ybjhn
sAX7m06hOztGhe3QiH/1
=HbAw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: