Re: Using wheezy or testing in sources.list for security updates

[Colin <colintempler@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
> This depends on what you intend to do when wheezy becomes stable.  Do
> you want to continue to use testing forever, or do you want to have a
> system that remains basically unchanged for a long time?  If the latter,
> use "wheezy" instead of "testing".
>
> Sven

I see.
I want to stay with testing in the long term but would prefer not to
await for security updates.
Right now security updates are treated as a normal update, that is a
normal package transition from unstable to testing, correct?

-- 
Cheers,
Colin