Version of flashplayer in different browsers
I am running KDE 3.5.10 on Debian Lenny. I have flashplayer working in
Iceweasel, running, according to it, flashplayer 11, installed with
flashplugin-nonfree. Konqueror, for reasons I cannot fathom says that it is
using both 7 and 11. It is giving the priority to 7, so flash won't run in
Konqueror. How do I get rid of 7?
As far as dpkg is concerned, I have only two packages:
lisi@Junior:~$ dpkg --get-selections | grep flash
flashplugin-nonfree install
flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound install
lisi@Junior:~$
lisi@Junior:~$ aptitude show flashplugin-nonfree
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 1:2.8.3~bpo50+1
Priority: optional
Section: contrib/web
Maintainer: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
Uncompressed Size: 139k
Depends: debconf | debconf-2.0, wget, gnupg, libatk1.0-0, libcairo2,
libfontconfig1,
libfreetype6, libgcc1, libglib2.0-0, libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14),
libnspr4-0d,
libnss3-1d, libpango1.0-0, libstdc++6, libx11-6, libxext6, libxt6,
libcurl3-gnutls
Suggests: iceweasel, konqueror-nsplugins, x-ttcidfont-conf, msttcorefonts,
ttf-dejavu,
ttf-xfree86-nonfree, flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound
Conflicts: flashplayer-mozilla, flashplugin (< 6), libflash-mozplugin, xfs (<
1:1.0.1-5)
Replaces: flashplugin (< 6)
Description: Adobe Flash Player - browser plugin
This package will download the Flash Player from Adobe. It is a
Netscape/Mozilla type
plugin. Any browser based on Netscape or Mozilla can use the Flash Player.
This
package currently supports the following browsers: Mozilla, Mozilla-Firefox,
Firefox,
Iceweasel, and Iceape. Also Galeon and Epiphany can use the Flash Player.
Konqueror
can also use the Flash Player if konqueror-nsplugins is installed.
WARNING: Installing this Debian package causes the Adobe Flash Player to be
downloaded
from www.adobe.com. The End User License Agreement of the Adobe Flash Player
is
available at www.adobe.com.
Homepage: http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer
lisi@Junior:~$ isi@Junior:~$
Thanks,
Lisi
Reply to: