[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ill advised blundering = nasty mess



On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:24:22 -0500, Harry wrote in message 
<[🔎] 87bou51bp5.fsf@newsguy.com>:

> NOTE:  Already posted on unbuntu list... but due to it being something
> of an urgent matter... and not seeing responses there... I'm posting
> here too since the tools are all debian tools.
> -----     --------     -----      --=--      -----     -------
> ----- 
> Due to unbridled personal bungling, I've created a nasty mess while
> installing sendmail.
> 
> I inadvertantly deleted /etc/init.d/sendmail.  Well I thought I'd just
> reinstall sendmail to re-acquire that file.
> 
> So uninstalled sendmail... with aptitude but it uninstalled a few
> other parts of the tools too.
> 
> There appear to be several packages involved.
> p   sendmail
> i   sendmail-base
> C   sendmail-bin
> i   sendmail-cf       
> 
> As you see, after several attempts at uninstall/reinstall, I now have
> some installed and some not.  The rub comes with sendmail-bin which is
> the package that contains /etc/init.d/sendmail
> 
> Any attempt to uninstall it tells me it is not installed, any attempt
> to install it ends with an error that appears to happen due to that
> missing file, or the fact that sendmail-bin cannot be --configured.
> 
> I've tried any number of ways to sneak up on it, but aptitude won't
> let me.  Or more accurately, I don't know how to use aptitude well
> enough to resolve the problem.
> 
> I tried apt-get with the --force-yes flag, in the hopes of forcing the
> install but it didn't work... showed the same dpkg error.
> 

..try the nuclear dpkg -P --force-XXX options, list'em with
--force-help, pile'em --force-* up till you get thru the armor,
then reinstall the debris sources and exim or postfix instead 
of your troublemaker sendmail.


-- 
-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


Reply to: