Re: Debian Questions on apt-get - erratum

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian Questions on apt-get - erratum
From: Lisi <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:33:36 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 201106062133.36498.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] BANLkTik3sU2B7=1Hs1D+oERaVZ0H=NEOmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] BANLkTi=qWWPbmpfLr5x4-L=RS4hXJwMhfw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 201106062022.58862.lisi.reisz@gmail.com> <[🔎] BANLkTik3sU2B7=1Hs1D+oERaVZ0H=NEOmw@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday 06 June 2011 21:25:52 Tom H wrote:
> You mean "apt-get dist-upgrade" ("aptitude full-upgrade" is the
> aptitude equivalent).

Thanks - I am much more familiar with aptitude.  Because aptitude 
has "switched" (by recommendation, not by formal instructions) from aptitude 
dist-upgrade to aptitude full-upgrade I assumed - falsely it transpires - 
that apt-get had done the same. :-(

Lisi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian Questions on apt-get - erratum
  - From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>

References:
- Debian Questions on apt-get
  - From: Matt <lm7812@gmail.com>
- Re: Debian Questions on apt-get - erratum
  - From: Lisi <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
- Re: Debian Questions on apt-get - erratum
  - From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian Questions on apt-get - erratum
Next by Date: Re: Debian Questions on apt-get
Previous by thread: Re: Debian Questions on apt-get - erratum
Next by thread: Re: Debian Questions on apt-get - erratum
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread