Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate

To: debian-user <Debian-User@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate
From: Nuno Magalhães <nunomagalhaes@eu.ipp.pt>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:30:22 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] AANLkTimiRnY-_empdo1iCYoQYGutM6WmEYrWMBAu1tD1@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110304101419.GT11847@codelibre.net>
References: <[🔎] 4D706E9F.9050606@cox.net> <[🔎] 20110304101419.GT11847@codelibre.net>

Hi,

What's the latest "official" "release"? C++02? C++03? Has Boost been
"officialized"? What about C#? I know it's not directly related, but
how do you figure fits the picture?

-- 
Mars 2 Stay!
http://xkcd.com/801/
/etc

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate
  - From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net>
- Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate
  - From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>

References:
- [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate
  - From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian Newbie need help
Next by Date: Re: Please help
Previous by thread: Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate
Next by thread: Re: [Semi-OT] Advice on whether a C++ book is still adequate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread