Re: Attaching vs. pastebin for big outputs [was: Re: Installation Size Different - bug ?]
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:24:16 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 01 nov 10, 11:56:55, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> Yes, what I meant is that many e-mail clients do not allow forcing a
>> non- break line and they wrap the bunch of logs into several lines what
>> is hard to interpret.
>
> What I meant:
>
> Wrapping (or otherwise touching) *attachments* on sending e-mail would
> be a serious bug in any mail client and I never heard of one doing that.
>
> I know wrapping *in-line* text is quite common, which is why I think
> attaching is better.
>
> *Viewing* attachments can also be done with external viewers if the
> built-in viewer has no option for unwrapping the text.
It could be a Pan/Gmane issue: I see text attachments and images as part
of the e-mail message (embedded) not as separate code. In fact, Pan does
not even allow sending attachments :-(
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: