ATA Disk problems.
Hello,
One of my mail servers is having some disk problems. I see stuff like this
in my log files:
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x4
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: ata1.00: cmd 25/00:f8:b7:79:ea/00:01:6d:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 258048 in
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: res 51/40:00:e8:79:ea/40:00:6d:00:00/00 Emask 0x9 (media error)
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: ata1.00: error: { UNC }
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE,SUGGEST_OK
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Sense Key : Medium Error [current] [descriptor]
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex):
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: 72 03 11 04 00 00 00 0c 00 0a 80 00 00 00 00 00
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: 6d ea 79 e8
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error - auto reallocate failed
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 1844083176
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: ata1: EH complete
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] 1953525168 512-byte hardware sectors (1000205 MB)
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] 1953525168 512-byte hardware sectors (1000205 MB)
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Sep 1 05:14:24 mail kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
This just started happening. Is it new disk time, or do I have something
set wrong? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ken
Reply to: