Re: asignar hora a PC
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:50:32 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 16:11:38 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>> > I would say it is d) "all of the above". If you understand Spanish,
>> > see for yourself:
>> >
>> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/09/msg01806.html
>>
>> That's unfair. I would not judge a user by just one post.
>
> I would say that depends on the post. In any case, I am judging this
> particular user on his overall posting history here on d-u, which began
> long before the one mail to which I linked (which is just the most
> drastic manifestation of his general attitude).
You cannot condemn an actitute that is not being perceived by the user.
And I don't think the OP knows what is he doing.
>> You must know that the Spanish list can be sometimes a bit
>> "un-pleasant" so I even could understood that overreaction.
>
> He did not quote any mails of others that would justify his rudeness and
> blatant lack of concern for the mailing list code of conduct.
Yes, it is quoted, badly, but quoted.
If you were a frequent user of the Spanish mailing list, you would have
noticed that many of the posts are directed not to the list but to the
users own e-mail address >:-)
>> I think many people here is not fully aware about the technological
>> limitations some users have to live with and treating such users as
>> just "nuts" is quite unjust, to say the least.
>
> Just and unjust is in the eye of the beholder. I was trying to make a
> much more straightforward point: If enough people continue to reward a
> certain behavior then it is likely that there will be an increase in the
> occurrence of this very behavior. Case in point: Our friend has just
> posted another Spanish message to d-u.
I know him from the Spanish mailing list so, as he barely replies to the
people who is giving some advice, I stopped from replying to his posts
some time ago ;-)
Look, every time he posts to the Spanish mailing list, it duplicates the
same message here. And note the *sending* time:
***
Original-Received: from cronos by gecgr.co.cu (MDaemon PRO v9.0.4)
with ESMTP id md50000092215.msg for <debian-user-
spanish@lists.debian.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:35 -0500
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
***
Original-Received: from cronos by gecgr.co.cu (MDaemon PRO v9.0.4)
with ESMTP id md50000092214.msg for <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Wed,
28 Apr 2010 14:11:59 -0500
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
***
There is just an interval of *35 seconds* between one mail and the other!
Wow, that is *so fast* if you are sending two different messages (to one
list and the other) because if you carefully review the e-mail headers,
the mailing list address is displayed in "To" field, in both cases. Not
"CC" nor "BCC".
Anyway... who cares? Me not :-)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: