Re: Musings on debian-user list
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Musings on debian-user list
- From: Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:02:31 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090803160231.GA32056@emurlahn.burrows.local>
- In-reply-to: <20090731005903.604e59c1@think.homelan>
- References: <20090728165259.GA22943@fuzzydev.org> <81c921f30907281013h79a0b626r6778ec1c8d2ecd68@mail.gmail.com> <631fe46c0907281025u4dbb6fc2uaf38cf5cb81b2e10@mail.gmail.com> <20090728174947.GB6911@fuzzydev.org> <631fe46c0907281109k767ca276p79e142cc67b82ce0@mail.gmail.com> <4A6F46A8.5010600@cox.net> <87k51soykf.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <20090729224755.GH25977@turki.gavron.org> <20090730151455.GA6496@emurlahn.burrows.local> <20090731005903.604e59c1@think.homelan>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:59:03AM +0300, Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:14:55 -0700
> Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > (3) mutt takes *ages* to load large folders, particularly if they're
> > maildir based. ISTM that an on-disk index would be a sensible
> > idea here.
>
> set header_cache="~/.mutt/cache/"
I've done that already. It still takes a good half-minute to a
minute to load a big mailbox, and it's worse if I have concurrent disk
activity going on.
Daniel
Reply to: