Re: HOWTO enhance Debian by removing HAL

[Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> Yes, even if it means to back out X's dependency on the almost dead
> HAL.  I'm not yet fully decided, but I might even be inclined to help
> him forking a more back to the roots Debian (without bash essential).

FWIW, removing bash from the list of essential packages (replacing it by
dash) is one of the release goals for squeeze [1]. It might be more
worthwhile for all of us, if you help debian to achieve the goal instead
of yet another fork. ;-)

Cheers,

Johannes

[1] http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090730
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkp1qNMACgkQC1NzPRl9qEUEGQCffuoswLhwMaxAsJmkvu7kgOKy
Y18Ani3qwiyVEGfz/33sUxV/jYC0Otbp
=FZe4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----