Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
- From: Chris Jones <cjns1989@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:07:04 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090603220704.GA2896@turki.gavron.org>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20090528133836.GA13101@emurlahn.burrows.local>
- References: <20090502133811.GC2893@turki.gavron.org> <49FF0CEA.8090904@fgm.com> <20090505223044.GE3005@turki.gavron.org> <4A0848A2.4030008@fgm.com> <20090516221105.GA2915@turki.gavron.org> <4A1C131C.1090806@fgm.com> <20090526181132.GA2896@turki.gavron.org> <4A1D610E.5090508@fgm.com> <20090528020859.GC2896@turki.gavron.org> <20090528133836.GA13101@emurlahn.burrows.local>
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:38:36AM EDT, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:08:59PM -0400, Chris Jones <cjns1989@gmail.com> was heard to say:
I didn't say anything..
> > There appear to be keyboards where some keys are physically located
> > in a spot that's easily accessible with the thumbs.
> > Maybe I should buy one?
> On that note: one of my colleagues bought a keyboard with pedals a
> few years ago. As I understand it, the pedals are used for shift
> states and control characters -- I haven't used it myself, but it
> seems like an interesting idea, and it continues the pianistic angle
> here. :-)
Pity you didn't film him in action.
I'd love to see that.
Reply to: