On Wed,03.Jun.09, 01:25:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 02.06.09 14:29, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > In <[🔎] 20090602185609.GA26122@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > >is 1.2.3lenny1 more than 1.2.3local1? I would want that to get upgraded... > > > > No. 1.2.3lenny1 < 1.2.3local1 because "lenny" < "local" because 'e' < 'o'. > > so iif I name it 'local0' and 'lenny1' comes out, it won't be installed > because the version number is smaller. I think the correct way is to *append* to the version, not munge it: 1.2.3lenny1+local1 (I like to use + as separator) That way 1.2.3lenny2 will be higher than my version. Check out 'dch', especially the '--local' option. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature