On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:12:09PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > >So what did you use instead? I have never had trouble with using > >"eth0" or "/dev/eth0" before. > > In the rare case that I needed to specify an interface name, I used the raw > kernel name (e.g. eth0) and not a pathname. Usually, I've only done this > for "lo", though. But that doesn't work with dhcp_probe. Is that a bug in dhcp_probe?