Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?

To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
From: "Barclay, Daniel" <daniel@fgm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:47:48 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 49FF0E24.1060907@fgm.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 49FF06D7.1040100@l33tmyst.com>
References: <[🔎] 87hc04vds8.fsf@jidanni.org> <[🔎] 49FB4E23.8040501@l33tmyst.com> <[🔎] 49FF0538.5060408@fgm.com> <[🔎] 49FF06D7.1040100@l33tmyst.com>

Title: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?

Harry Rickards wrote:

> Have you tried configuring Outlook to send in plain text by default,
> using the instructions at http://www.expita.com/nomime.html#out2002?

Read my signature more carefully.

Daniel
--
(Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
  - From: Harry Rickards <hrickards@l33tmyst.com>

References:
- why must emacs depend on sound packages?
  - From: jidanni@jidanni.org
- Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
  - From: Harry Rickards <hrickards@l33tmyst.com>
- Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
  - From: "Barclay, Daniel" <daniel@fgm.com>
- Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
  - From: Harry Rickards <hrickards@l33tmyst.com>

Prev by Date: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
Next by Date: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
Previous by thread: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
Next by thread: Re: why must emacs depend on sound packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread