Re[2]: gateway doesn't locate at the same subnet of the IP Address.
On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 17:18, trace.localhost@gmail.com wrote:
> hongyi.zhao@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 16:10, davee@ceu.ox.ac.uk wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, 02.04.2009 at 12:41 +0800, hongyi.zhao@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
>>>> Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>>>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.32
>>>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
>>>> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.129
>>>> DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.10
>>>> 129.226.8.7
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Now, I switched from windowsxp to debian with the above ip
>>>> configurations, but I don't know how should I set my debian using the
>>>> above ip configurations, to be more specifically, the main issue in my
>>>> case is that: the gateway doesn't locate at the same subnet of the IP
>>>> Address.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>> As you rightly point out, the gateway is not located on the same subnet
>>> as your IP address. In effect this means that you cannot communicate to
>>> any host beyond your own subnet.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> I'd called this IP setup 'broken'!
>>>
>>
>>
>>> It sounds like either your IP address is set incorrectly, or
>>> alternatively that your gateway address is set incorrectly.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> In order to fix this, you need either:
>>>
>>
>>
>>> - a different IP address, falling in the same subnet as your quoted
>>> gateway address, or
>>>
>>
>>
>>> - a corrected gateway address which shares the same subnet as your
>>> quoted IP address.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> If you're on a corporate or academic network, I'd speak to your local
>>> network admin to figure out what the correct settings should be, because
>>> the settings you give above will not work on *any* OS (assuming the
>>> information you've provided is accurate and complete).
>>>
>>
>> This is just what puzzle me a lot. In fact, I obtain the above ip
>> configurations from within my windows xp by _ipconfig /all_ and the windows
>> xp itself can surf on the Internet smoothly, for you information, I
>> give you here all of the informations of the command _ipconfig /all_:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ipconfig/all
>>
>> Windows IP Configuration
>>
>> Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : 32c428cacc2141e
>> Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
>> Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown
>> IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>> WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>>
>> Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
>>
>> Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
>> Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek RTL8139 Family PCI Fast Ethe
>> rnet NIC
>> Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1B-FC-2E-2B-6C
>> Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 210.73.34.32
>> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
>> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.129
>> DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 159.226.135.10
>> 129.226.8.7
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>> Dave.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Can you run a traceroute and reply back with the results?
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert www.google.cn
Tracing route to google.cn [203.208.33.100]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 159.226.135.129
2 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.6.13
3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.6.1
4 62 ms 63 ms 62 ms 159.226.46.165
5 62 ms 62 ms 62 ms 8.201 [159.226.254.109]
6 * * 62 ms 8.194 [159.226.254.62]
7 63 ms 62 ms 62 ms 219.142.17.37
8 63 ms 62 ms * bj141-131-17.bjtelecom.net [219.141.131.17]
9 63 ms 63 ms 63 ms bj141-130-82.bjtelecom.net [219.141.130.82]
10 63 ms 63 ms 63 ms 219.142.13.142
11 * 63 ms 63 ms pk-in-f100.google.com [203.208.33.100]
Trace complete.
--
Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao@gmail.com>
Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry
Chinese Academy of Sciences
GnuPG DSA: 0xD108493
2009-4-2
Reply to: