[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Top posting vs Bottom posting



On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:57:09AM EDT, Barclay, Daniel wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:51:31PM EDT, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > 
> > [..]
> > 
> >> I need to see the relevant context quoted (properly trimmed as the
> >> discussion progresses, of course), especially if a thread has run for
> >> a while. 
> > 
> > Most "business" mail runs something like this:
> > 
> > -> hey, Dee.. got my fax?
> > 
> >    (Cc: my boss, her boss.. )
> > 
> > <- Yeah, got it.. Thanks!
> > 
> >    (Cc: same)
> > 
> > Where I work, over 90% of the emails that I see are of this nature.
> > 
> > There's no need for "context" whatsoever.. all parties know what the fax
> > is about.. 
> 
> Does that example represent two message or one?
> 
> If it's one:
> 
> That's a good example of bottom posting (quoting what's being replied to
> ("got my fax?) for context about the reply ("got it").
> 
> If it's two:
> 
> How can you argue that there's no need for context?  

That's my point .. it's not e-mail .. it's instant messaging.



Reply to: