[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kernel naming conventions?



Kent West:
> 
> 1. Why the change from "kernel-image..." to "linux-image..."?

Because it is more specific and Debian can run on more kernels than just
linux. Not that many people actually /use/ other kernels, but it's
possible.

> 2. What is "-xen" and "-vserver"

Hm, Kernels for Xen and Vserver? Both of them are kernels for hardware
virtualization.

> 4. What's the difference between, say, "linux-image-2.6" and  
> "linux-image-2.6-686" and "linux-image-2.6.18-6-686"?

Look at them with apt-cache show. Many of the linux-image-* packages
don't occupy space and just pull in the "right" kernel as a dependency.l
Which one you choose depends on how much of a control freak you are.

> I understand the  
> last one is a specific version of the 2.6.18 kernel (the 6th sub-variant  
> of the 2.6.18 kernel compiled for i686 machines?), but is the 2.6-686  
> the 1st version of the i686 kernel, or something else?

No, it depends on the latest 2.6 kernel for 686.

J.
-- 
I count my partner's eyelashes.
[Agree]   [Disagree]
                 <http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: