Re: Question about my Ethernet Cards
Sure.
--- Ethernet (1000 Mbit)
│ │
│ │ <M> DL2000/TC902x-based
Gigabit Ethernet support
│ │
│ │ <M> Intel(R) PRO/1000
Gigabit Ethernet support
│ │
│ │ [*] Use Rx Polling
(NAPI)
│ │
│ │ [ ] Disable Packet
Split for PCI express adapters
│ │
│ │ <M> Intel(R) PRO/1000
PCI-Express Gigabit Ethernet support
│ │
│ │ <M> IP1000 Gigabit
Ethernet support
│ │
│ │ <M> Intel(R) 82575
PCI-Express Gigabit Ethernet support
│ │
│ │ <M> National
Semiconductor DP83820 support
│ │
│ │ <M> Packet Engines
Hamachi GNIC-II support
│ │
│ │ <M> Packet Engines
Yellowfin Gigabit-NIC support (EXPERIMENTAL)
│ │
│ │ <M> Realtek 8169 gigabit
ethernet support
│ │
│ │ [*] Use Rx Polling
(NAPI) (EXPERIMENTAL)
│ │
│ │ [*] VLAN support
│ │
│ │ <M> SiS190/SiS191 gigabit
ethernet support
│ │
│ │ <M> New SysKonnect
GigaEthernet support
│ │
│ │ [ ] Debugging interface
│ │
│ │ <M> SysKonnect Yukon2
support
│ │
│ │ [ ] Debugging interface
│ │
│ │ <M> VIA Velocity support
│ │
│ │ <M> QLogic QLA3XXX
Network Driver Support
│ │
│ │ <M> Attansic L1 Gigabit
Ethernet support (EXPERIMENTAL)
│ │
│ │
On 1/14/09, Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:51:56 -0500
> "Boxuan Gu" <boxuan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I forgot to mention how to build my kernel.
>>
>> 1. apt-get source linux-2.26
>> 2. cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.26
>> 3. make menuconfig
>> 4. make-kpkg clean
>> 5.make-kpkg --initrd --revision=mykernel.1.0 kernel_image
>> 6.dpkg -i ../linux-image-2.6.26_mykernel.1.0.deb (it is the deb file
>> containing kernel image)
>>
>> Is there anything wrong?
>
> That looks perfectly correct; I don't know why you can't find it.
> Would you mind listing which drivers you *do* see under 1000Mbit?
>
> Celejar
> --
> mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
> ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
Boxuan Gu
Reply to: