Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
Steve Lamb wrote:
> I have RTL 0.2.0 on there from a suggestion you made a while back about
> 0.3.1 not playing nice with IMAP while the older version did.
> Older versions needed either Mnenhy(which you have) or Enigmail(which I
> have) to work. 0.3.0 does not need either. But here's the kick in the nads I
> just read on the web page for it. The preview pane needs to be open and I
> turn that idiotic crap off.
All of this looks confirmed. I installed 0.2.1, reply-to-list still did
not work, pane open or not. Installed 0.3.0 and TBird crashes any time I open
up a message. So I would need 0.2.0 or 0.2.1, neither of which work.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Moderation Robot <robomod@news.nic.it>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Ken Teague <kteague@pobox.com>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>