Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
Ron Johnson wrote:
> My User-Agent string is a lot more "rich" than yours. Are you
> purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
> ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Probably not. This one better? Still no r-t-l here.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Moderation Robot <robomod@news.nic.it>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Ken Teague <kteague@pobox.com>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
- Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>