Re: dfsg, needs explanation

To: Umarzuki Mochlis <umarzuki@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dfsg, needs explanation
From: Daryl Styrk <darylstyrk@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:20:54 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 490D1C96.1010106@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 52d26d930811011944v236085a3v2035088c7498e119@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 52d26d930811011944v236085a3v2035088c7498e119@mail.gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
> *License must not be specific to Debian, basically a reiteration of the last
> point*
> 
> what does "reiteration of the last point" really means.

The rights attached to the program must not depend on the program's
being part of a Debian system.

I read it to mean if you write a program, the program license must all
it to also run on another OS.  Say Fedora.  So you can't say this can
only be used for Debian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkNHJYACgkQejxzjThnMmKVxACfexC27QgpKE5Xja0qqYAnIHYp
/XUAoJH80EFzqDE927eLMB4WNHf6IwpT
=wwYP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- dfsg, needs explanation
  - From: "Umarzuki Mochlis" <umarzuki@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: dfsg, needs explanation
Next by Date: Re: Broken perl
Previous by thread: Re: dfsg, needs explanation
Next by thread: Re: dfsg, needs explanation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread