Re: 64bit vs i386

To: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 64bit vs i386
From: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:54:28 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080514065428.GW14765@zip.com.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 482A834E.5010109@cox.net>
References: <[🔎] d82d32e0805130945r62dcc434h20f5b4a6f90d54f@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20080514031517.GB5758@penguin.codegnome.org> <[🔎] 482A793C.9020502@cox.net> <[🔎] 20080514053705.GV14765@zip.com.au> <[🔎] 482A834E.5010109@cox.net>

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 01:14:38AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>> You may also not be able to access all your RAM,
> >> Sure, on the 80486 or early Pentia.  But everything since then has PAE.
> > 
> > With a performance hit. :)
> 
> You conveniently snipped the part where I agreed with the RAM
> performance hit.

Do not credit conspiracy that which can be easily explained by
clarification.

-- 
	"Police noticed some rustling sounds from Linn's bottom area
	and on closer inspection a roll of cash was found protruding
	from Linn's anus, the full amount of cash taken in the robbery."
		- http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/robber-hides-loot-up-his-booty/2008/05/09/1210131248617.html

Reply to:

References:
- 64bit vs i386
  - From: "Abraham Chaffin" <abrahamchaffin@gmail.com>
- Re: 64bit vs i386
  - From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <nospam@codegnome.org>
- Re: 64bit vs i386
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: 64bit vs i386
  - From: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
- Re: 64bit vs i386
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

Prev by Date: CD has not been seen in debian40r3 console
Next by Date: Re: CD has not been seen in debian40r3 console
Previous by thread: Re: 64bit vs i386
Next by thread: Re: 64bit vs i386
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread