On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:42:26PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > I see it under unstable also: > > > > > > Package: xmms (1:1.2.10+20070601-1 and others) [debports] > > > > > > What's 'debports'? > > > > That's what I was going to ask *you*! Here is my apt-cache policy: > > > > ,----[ apt-cache policy xmms ] > > | xmms: > > | Installed: (none) > > | Candidate: 1:1.2.10+20061101-1etch1 > > | Version table: > > | 1:1.2.10+20061101-1etch1 0 > > | 500 http://ftp.at.debian.org etch/main Packages > > `---- > > > > How is yours? > > :-) > > Look at http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html > > Search for xmms -- there are a few pointers to bug reports. > > Also see what: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=xmms&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious > > has to say. > > Also there is a link which answers the question, "why is this package > not in testing yet" which unfortunately I don't have off the cuff[1], > but if you are running testing then you should at least know about them. > > [1] Hopefully google will bring up the answer. Chris, I think you were misreading my reply. I know very well why xmms is not in testing: because it was removed from the distro! Only stable is carrying it now. I asked Hugo to show his 'apt-cache policy xmms' because this could shed some light on why he still sees it in unstable. I'm guessing some unofficial repo. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature