Re: Did the syntax for a samba /etc/fstab entry change?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Did the syntax for a samba /etc/fstab entry change?
From: "Michael Marsh" <michael.a.marsh@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:20:43 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] ceb0ad00804051120o1df9968dtdfef562265bb225e@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 47F7B128.20706@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 47F4460C.1010507@gmail.com> <[🔎] ceb0ad00804031358p5657fce2seb9ace1a3fd51003@mail.gmail.com> <47F7A2B6.9020108@gmail.com> <[🔎] ceb0ad00804050949md20d000hb65496de437f67f6@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 47F7B128.20706@gmail.com>

On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Tom Epperly <tepperly@gmail.com> wrote:
>  Yes My Pictures is shared.  I tried a couple of other things.
>
>  # mount -t cifs //brightlywoven /mnt/PictureArchive
>  Mounting the DFS root for a particular server not implemented yet
>
>  No ip address specified and hostname not found
>
>  # mount -t cifs //brightlywoven/SharedDocs /mnt/PictureArchive
>  mount error: could not find target server. TCP name
> brightlywoven/SharedDocs not found
>
>  No ip address specified and hostname not found

What does smbtree show?

-- 
Michael A. Marsh
http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~mmarsh
http://mamarsh.blogspot.com
http://36pints.blogspot.com

Reply to:

References:
- Did the syntax for a samba /etc/fstab entry change?
  - From: Tom Epperly <tepperly@gmail.com>
- Re: Did the syntax for a samba /etc/fstab entry change?
  - From: "Michael Marsh" <michael.a.marsh@gmail.com>
- Re: Did the syntax for a samba /etc/fstab entry change?
  - From: "Michael Marsh" <michael.a.marsh@gmail.com>
- Re: Did the syntax for a samba /etc/fstab entry change?
  - From: Tom Epperly <tepperly@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Did the syntax for a samba /etc/fstab entry change?
Next by Date: Re: bits/news from the users of Debian?
Previous by thread: Re: Did the syntax for a samba /etc/fstab entry change?
Next by thread: [OT] sqlite-amalgamation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread