On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:23:10PM +0000, T o n g wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:59:35 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > Instead of complaining pointlessly, maybe you could have said > > something like: . . . > > Sorry about my attitude, I was very disappointed that I carefully wrote > the OP but nobody *seems* to read it carefully. Apology accepted! I'm sure its frustrating, but it doesn't help anyone (you included ;) to not point out again that you'd tried that. I'm glad you got it sorted out in the other half of this thread. > > Thanks again to *anyone* who offered help. > > > No. I don't want to go back into my archive of 20,000 d-u posts and > > find your OP and read it in close detail now that we are several > > levels into this thread. Do you see? You are asking for help but > > asking the helpers to jump through hoops because you are unwilling to > > repeat yourself. . . > > Hmm..., maybe it is time to view the d-u posts on news client via gmane > (gmane.org) now. You will love it, and people don't need to quote or > repeat excessively. Well, I'm actually pretty happy with my current setup, though I do occaisionally think of that switch. There's something just so geeky, though, about having all of d-u archived here locally. Silly I know, but there it is. regards A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature