Re: Another flood of spam

[David Brodbeck <brodbd@u.washington.edu>]

On Jan 7, 2008, at 3:32 PM, David wrote:

> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > In other words, give the list guys a break.  It will likely be  
> > fixed in
> > a day or so.
>
> Agreed!
>
> And, I've made the point before, spam is good.
> Without it, spam filtering wouldn't evolve.

That's like saying "if not for thieves, we wouldn't have developed  
door locks."  It's true, but it doesn't mean that theft is good.