[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: non-text attachment scrubbed (sendmail)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/21/07 10:32, Steve Kleene wrote:
> I recently started a thread on another forum (mplayer), and now all of my
> follow-up posts show up as follows:
> 
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: not available
>> Type: text/plaintext
>> Size: 846 bytes
>> Desc: not available
>> Url : http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/...
> 
> and you have to go the cited URL to see the post.  It should just be a simple
> plain-text mail with no attachments.
> 
> I sent the e-mail by:
> 
>   1. creating it with mailto
>   2. manually adding a References: line to preserve threading
>   3. sending it to the forum with sendmail
> 
> I have done the same in this forum, and it has worked fine.  The header I saw
> before sending the follow-up to the mplayer forum was:
> 
>> From skmpl@syrano.acb.uc.edu  Sun Oct 21 09:08:21 2007
>> Return-Path: <skmpl@syrano.acb.uc.edu>
>> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:08:21 -0400
>> From: Steve Kleene <skmpl@syrano.acb.uc.edu>
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> To: mplayer-users@mplayerhq.hu
>> Subject: Re: [MPlayer-users] Can't seek to block 2102267
>> Message-ID: <1053_22740_1192972101_1@syrano.acb.uc.edu>
>> Content-ID: <1053_22740_1192972101_1@syrano.acb.uc.edu>
>> Content-type: text/plain
>> References: <1053_16997_1192826707_1@syrano.acb.uc.edu> <[snip]@fastwebnet.it>
>> Status: R
> 
> Deleting the two lines that start with "Content" didn't fix the problem.
> 
> Any ideas why this is seen as a "non-text attachment"?  (I know there are
> other mailers, but I'm interested in figuring this out.)

Maybe you formed the mail improperly?

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHHBkrS9HxQb37XmcRApEGAJoDTZKi0+Dih1qqbKl0LTs4/6fFcQCglYAS
s091D9EXNso7WdDE3ahPVMA=
=BUa2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: