[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Query about Iceape, Iceweasel



On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:34:47PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:13:54AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > > Miles Bader wrote:
> > > > I expect that google is somewhat chary about adding more buttons to
> > > > their UI (look how long it took them to add a "delete" button!),
> > > > especially one as potentially confusing as reply-to-list-only.  The
> > > > current reply-to-all is much safer.
> > > 
> > >     Which is the exact reason why reply-to-list has been an open bug for =
> > > TB!
> > > for going on 4-5 years now.  They don't want to add another button and ca=
> > > n't
> > > agree on what the default behavior should be or if they should have a dro=
> > > pdown
> > >  menu like 1/2 the other buttons.  *sigh*
> > 
> > I started a small mailing list for some old buddies and I to use as we
> > plan our camping trip for next year. Its something we do every 4 years
> > or so and it generates all kinds of mail in the process. I thought a
> > list would be a great way to manage that stuff. 
> 
> Yep, same for me

what were you using? 
> 
> And because of that I opted for the "groups" feature of one big free 
> mail provider. It comes will all the "bells and whistles", like subject 
> tagging and reply-to munging. Yuck!

I thought of that, but it was just so easy to set-up and I even ended
up just manually signing up my friends (minimalist here, just a flat
text list of the subscribers). I've also avoided reply-to munging, but
I may just do it so I can stop reposting stuff to the list.

A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: