[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: raid1 mdadm v's lvm



On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 03:19:50PM +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
> 2007/10/18, Alex Samad <alex@samad.com.au>:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 01:39:21PM +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
> 
> > > IMHO lvm mirroring is useless. if I do LVM (on servers) I have
> > > multiple drives and i tend to trust mdadm more in this field than LVM
> > > (don't ask me why - I couldn't logically say why).
> >
> > it would be good to here from somebody that uses lvm mirroring.  I would like
> > to access some of that extra space that would be made available if I did
> > mirroring at the lvm level instead of the md level.
> 
> wouldn't that defeat the purpose of mirror?
There is some data I would like on raid1 and some I don;t care about, ie ripped 
music, video's, stuff I backup off computer and offsite, if I lose a days worth 
of stuff who cares, or if I have to re rip it who cares.  Hopefully HD smart 
will warn me of a failing disk and I can use lvm to more the lv to another pv.  

For the important stuff I do want raid1.

LVM just seems more flexible to cutting up and managing raw space than mdadm, 
with the later I have to create to pools of space raid1 and raid0 and I have to 
define it at the initial setup, with lvm all the space goes to a vg and I can 
define it at creation of the lv

> 
> I think if I do mirror my data I _want_ it to be redundantent (how do
> you spell that?). I wouldn't want to risk something by gaining a few %
> of space, rather I'd like to be assured that if a disk dies I can
> simply replace it and LVM will not even take care about that (hotplug
> with mdadm) - on the other hand I never looked into mirroring LVM
> because mdadm is just made for that. Correct me if I'm wrong.

yep, it seems like lvm is slower (!?) than mdadm mirroring, so I will stick 
with raid1 under lvm



> 
> martin
> 
> -- 
> http://noneisyours.marcher.name
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/NoneIsYours
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: