[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mdadm, partitioned array



also sprach michael@estone.ca <michael@estone.ca> [2007.10.09.0611 +0100]:
> So, as far as I can tell, I only see the slow down on the first
> partition of a partitioned single raid 5 array. (Didn't test raid
> 1 or raid 10)

Can you try a third partition.

> Interesting results.

Weird indeed. You might want to take this up with
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org. It's definitely *not* an mdadm problem,
but rather a problem with the in-kernel md driver.



also sprach Douglas A. Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca> [2007.10.09.1718 +0100]:
> LVM is perfect.

You wish. :)

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
someday we'll find it
the rainbow connection
the lovers, the dreamers,
and me!
                                                             -- kermit

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Reply to: