Re: browser confusions

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: browser confusions
From: Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:03:43 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 46DD115F.5070804@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 46DD0305.4030603@earthlink.net>
References: <[🔎] 1188887322.6073.2.camel@h1.unixindia.com> <[🔎] 46DD0305.4030603@earthlink.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mumia W.. wrote:
[snip]

> Iceape and Firefox are split-offs from Mozilla. So long as you update
> your system regularly, Iceape will be the most secure.

firefox is rebranded as iceweasel on debian.

How do you come to the conclusion that firefox/iceweasel is less secure
than iceape?

Johannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG3RFfC1NzPRl9qEURAuSVAJ9TJjfGNfGvxPnHY7sAiU2PqQjJdACdEATy
4/PdjHgnDjw6UfdSlhfbi9M=
=KlpD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: browser confusions
  - From: "Mumia W.." <paduille.4061.mumia.w+nospam@earthlink.net>

References:
- browser confusions
  - From: Bhasker C V <bhasker@unixindia.com>
- Re: browser confusions
  - From: "Mumia W.." <paduille.4061.mumia.w+nospam@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: etch : system hangs
Next by Date: Re: Problems regarding sound
Previous by thread: Re: browser confusions
Next by thread: Re: browser confusions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread