[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Mathematics and the uselessness of numbers (was Re: Help buying Economic Printer)



On 31 Jul, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Sorry for joining this OT thread.
> 
> Don't get misled by the subject; this has nothing to do with
> mathematics:
> 
> 1) stddev's only apply, if temperatures would vary statistically and
> would therefore show a Gaussian distribution around a mean value.
> Neither is the case.
> 

The definition of standard deviation has nothing to do with Gaussian
distributions.  It is arguable more useful if the variable varies
randomly (Gaussian distribution).

> 2) If temperatures would vary statistically, it would be enough to
> give the stddev, because 'above' and 'below' would be the same value.
> 
> The fact that 'above' and 'below' are generally different values, is a
> direct hint that 1) does not apply. This is probably one of the
> reasons why meteorologists give mean temperatures in January and July,
> but no stddev.
> 
> Johannes
> 

One can certainly give the standard deviation of maximum and minimum
temperatures.  It may not be useful for calculating other figures of
merit though, especially if the time interval considered is small.

-Chris 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   Christopher Judd, Ph. D.                      judd@wadsworth.org   |
------------------------------------------------------------------------


IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally
privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure.  It
is intended only for the addressee.  If you received this in error or
from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not
distribute, copy or use it or any attachments.  Please notify the
sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your
system. Thank you for your cooperation.




Reply to: