[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: digikam upgrade: plugins to be remove



roy.nico@free.fr wrote:
> hello.
> 
> I have the same problem :
> * if i install digikam, then kipi-plugins is removed automatically
> * if i install kipi, then digikam is removed .
> :-(
> 
> and about :
>> "All plugins previously provided by the digikamimageplugins package are
>>  now included in this package."
> I don't see anymore in digikam the possibility to treat several
> pictures together (like resizing for example). This was earlier in the
> "tools" menu.
> 
> regards,
> 
> nicolas
> 
> 

I have since removed kipi-plugins for now. I see that a newer version of
kipi-plugins is required to work with digikam:
--------------------------------------------------------
$> sudo aptitude -s install kipi-plugins
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following packages are BROKEN:
  digikam
The following NEW packages will be automatically installed:
  sane-utils
The following packages have been kept back:
  transcode
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  kipi-plugins sane-utils
0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 7748kB of archives. After unpacking 16.5MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  digikam: Conflicts: kipi-plugins (<= 0.1.3~rc0) but 0.1.2-3 is to be
installed.
Resolving dependencies...
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

Remove the following packages:
digikam

Score is 119

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] q
--------------------------------------------------------


So you may want to wait till the new version of kipi-plugins comes into
testing. From this page:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kipi-plugins.html, it looks like the
package for sparc architecture is holding it from being included in Testing.

->HS




Reply to: